OncoSkepsis running on a MacBook, showing the evidence review workflow and the checks required before export.
Actual app preview with synthetic data

OncoSkepsis / Precision oncology

Clarity for
complex cases.

From scattered research to traceable evidence, ready for the people making the decisions.

Cited.

A source behind each statement.

Graded.

Evidence with its limitations in view.

Human-signed.

Your team has the final word.

More information.
Still unanswered questions.

A rare alteration. Conflicting findings. A case that does not fit neatly into a database.

Oncology moves quickly. Understanding what the literature means for the case in front of you takes more than another search.

OncoSkepsis brings clinical context, primary literature, and critical appraisal into one evidence workspace for Molecular Tumor Boards.

Meet the workspace

Built around the evidence

Every conclusion.
Open to examination.

Follow a statement back to its source. Read the reasoning. Make the judgement your own.

OncoSkepsis evidence review workspace showing the case workflow and the checks required before export.
The OncoSkepsis evidence workspaceProduct preview with synthetic data

A considered path from case to board.

Start with the clinical question.

Tumour type, molecular findings, treatment history, and the question for the board. Evidence begins with context.

A structured case for evidence retrieval

Built for the people
around the table.

Different disciplines. One shared foundation for the discussion.

Oncology & molecular teams

Bring the case, the alteration, and the clinical question into focus.

Evidence & pharmacy teams

Examine the literature, evidence strength, and treatment context together.

The review board

Accept, reword, or reject each statement. Keep a record of the judgement behind the output.

An open research journal and layered papers on a sunlit table, with a green glass lens.

Trust is a process.
Build it into every case.

Traceable by design

Keep sources, appraisal, and reviewer decisions connected. An evidence package should show how it was reached.

Human review before export

Named reviewers accept, edit, or reject the evidence. Required reviews and checks must be completed before a package can be exported.

In your environment

Discuss an on-premise deployment with our team, shaped around your institution’s infrastructure and governance requirements.

Built on BioSkepsis.
Focused on oncology.

Literature retrieval, critical appraisal, and evidence synthesis, brought together around the clinical case.

For Molecular Tumor Boards

Give the next case
a clearer starting point.

We’re working with MTB design partners to shape how evidence reaches the board. Bring your perspective.

Contact us

info@efevretech.com